Visit Zydor's column >>

ZYDOR

Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 9; Links Seeded: 411
Member Since: 8/2008Last Seen: 1/06/2009

Live to 43 or 86? Depends on where you live

Read ArticleArticle Source: msnbc.com
advertisement

Major inequalities in health and life expectancy persist worldwide, according to an independent World Health Organization commission.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
42
3.0

0.5
Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
{"commentId":2621143,"authorDomain":"zydor"}

This will have the inevitable arguments rolling .... especially after this comment:

"It's not perhaps the best use of the money that is being spent. And there are a lot people who feel that and would actually like to see coming out of the current campaign in the U.S. proposals for a universal health insurance," Marmot said.

With a Global aging population in every country, healthcare is a Universal issue that cannot be avoided. It will need to be tackled in the end. Its just a case of who is holding the parcel in each Country when the music stops.

{"commentId":2621143,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"zydor"}
  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:58 PM EDT
{"commentId":2622921,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

As the article plainly states health care in the US is on the decline. That is a part of the Republican legacy under the Bush administration. I do not see how the US can contribute to world health care until we get the situation in our country under control.

{"commentId":2622921,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
{"commentId":2623126,"authorDomain":"tmstormy"}

Yep, I guess everything is GW's fault according to stupid people like you. I guess you would be happy with a universal insurance plan or socialized medicine in this country. Why don't you study the facts instead of laying blame where it doesn't belong...

{"commentId":2623126,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"tmstormy"}
    #1.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:34 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2623971,"authorDomain":"liquorup"}
    liquorupDeleted
    Reply
    {"commentId":2621637,"authorDomain":"jcwatkins26"}

    The success of universal health care in a country is made or broken by the individual health care choices by the citizens of that country. If people make healthy choices throughout their daily lives then universal health care is manageable due to people having to go to the Dr less. If people make poor health choices then the system is over burdened and will fail (meaning people will have to pay for insurance). That is why it has not worked in America. Look at the Forbes top ten list of the most expensive medical conditions to treat. 6 of those are conditions related to obesity. Which country has the highest rate of overweight people?

    {"commentId":2621637,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"jcwatkins26"}
    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:36 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2622939,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

    Some people can not afford to make healthy choices.

    {"commentId":2622939,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
    • 3 votes
    #2.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
    {"commentId":2624039,"authorDomain":"dogstar78"}

    The fact is healthy choices are most often less expensive then unhealthy choices. Especially when it comes to dietary choices, which so very often the cause/avoidance health problems.

    Who are these "some people" you refer to? A shop worn vehicle to attempt to instill guilt in those of us who take the time and effort to be able to identify healthy choices from unhealthy ones?

    Pleading poverty to every last issue under the sun is a loser's strategy.

    {"commentId":2624039,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"dogstar78"}
      #2.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:41 PM EDT
      {"commentId":2624334,"authorDomain":"captain-ami"}

      As a college student doing my best to stay healthy on a very low budget, I have to contradict that statement. Most of the time the healthy choices, especially dietary ones, are consistently more expensive.

      In addition to that, being unable to afford health insurance I am watching many problems arise over a span of a few years that could have been avoided by regular visits to the dentist, optometrist, and recommended follow-ups at the chiropractor and gynecologist. Unfortunately, I can't afford to pay for full-time college tuition and health care at the same time.

      It's a very common problem. Even temporary financial straights can set someone back considerably in their health.

      {"commentId":2624334,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"captain-ami"}
        #2.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:05 PM EDT
        Reply
        {"commentId":2621833,"authorDomain":"agss404"}

        The worldwide distribution of food is an impossibility, and now some propose a worldwide healthcare system? What fantasy world do these people live in? I suppose that think logistics are people that live in a log.

        {"commentId":2621833,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"agss404"}
          Reply#3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:52 PM EDT
          {"commentId":2622958,"authorDomain":"zydor"}

          Read the article, they are pushing for an adoption of Universal Healthcare as an acknowledged principle in each Country, not some omnipotent global system.... the latter would be plain lunacy.

          {"commentId":2622958,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"zydor"}
          • 1 vote
          #3.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
          {"commentId":2623331,"authorDomain":"agss404"}

          It is lunacy to think that places like Zimbabwe care one wit about their citizens. A complete Utopian dream.

          {"commentId":2623331,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"agss404"}
            #3.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:47 PM EDT
            {"commentId":2623563,"authorDomain":"zydor"}

            Of course it is - just because some parts of the Planet cant at present aspire to it, does not make the goal invalid. You cant achieve a goal until you know what the goal is to achieve ..... Meanwhile the others who can, need to talk as to why they don't want to. Its of course an individual choice across countries, but just because some cant at present does not make the goal invalid.

            {"commentId":2623563,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"zydor"}
            • 1 vote
            #3.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:04 PM EDT
            Reply
            {"commentId":2622390,"authorDomain":"weiser"}

            Goes to show the old saying, "Only the strong survive", and in this case, the affluent and intellectual. I feel it's more physical/genetic limitations than economic up-bringings. This has been the case since the dawn of time. The "feelers" of society need to understand this.

            {"commentId":2622390,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"weiser"}
            • 2 votes
            Reply#4 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:37 PM EDT
            {"commentId":2622960,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

            I think that the greatest cause to poor health is economic conditions. It is the poor who suffer.

            {"commentId":2622960,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
            • 2 votes
            #4.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
            {"commentId":2623040,"authorDomain":"kickthedog55"}
            hadenough-345907Deleted
            {"commentId":2623953,"authorDomain":"lannykugel-1"}

            Dear "person", "poison that's put in poor people's food?"
            I'm not "super rich" so I'm guessing I'm not an inbred. Please throw out a few facts here. Where did you get the information that you stated your"facts" on?

            {"commentId":2623953,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"lannykugel-1"}
            • 1 vote
            #4.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:36 PM EDT
            {"commentId":2655216,"authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}

            The more affluent peoples with health care aren't inbred - but modern medicine is allowing weak traits to be passed on by keeping people who probably would have died in infancy or childhood - before they had time to reproduce - to pass on weak traits to the next generation. We've had two or three generations of this in our country now.

            {"commentId":2655216,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}
              #4.4 - Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:52 AM EDT
              Reply
              {"commentId":2622452,"authorDomain":"bker1492"}

              So two people living in the same city (Glasgow), in a country (UK) that has an extensive Universal Health Care Sytem (Which sucks), have life expectancies 28 years different. And WHO, and the Democrats want the whole world and the USA, to have the same plan. Hmmmmmmmm.

              {"commentId":2622452,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"bker1492"}
                Reply#5 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:43 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2622482,"authorDomain":"bker1492"}

                So two people living in the same city (Glasgow) in a country (UK) that has universal health care (Which sucks I might add), have life expectencies 28 years different. And the Democrats want Universal Health Care for the good ol US of A. No thanks.

                {"commentId":2622482,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"bker1492"}
                • 3 votes
                Reply#6 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:45 PM EDT
                {"commentId":2623480,"authorDomain":"Horrified"}

                I've talked to people from the UK and Canada... Universal health care is not that great, and can actually lead to bigger problems. (This is coming from someone who can't afford insurance)

                {"commentId":2623480,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"Horrified"}
                • 3 votes
                #6.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:58 PM EDT
                Reply
                {"commentId":2622512,"authorDomain":"datesmen"}

                This is a misleading article.The heading for this makes you think they will show a map state by state about longevity.Instead what you get in the article is nothing like that.Infact it does'nt show you anything about state by state life expectancy.This was a big let down and misrepresentation.

                {"commentId":2622512,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"datesmen"}
                  Reply#7 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:47 PM EDT
                  {"commentId":2622779,"authorDomain":"linda-dahlstrom"}

                  H Mark, I'm editing this story and just added a state-by-state map. It's there now if you click refresh.

                  {"commentId":2622779,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"linda-dahlstrom"}
                    #7.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:08 PM EDT
                    {"commentId":2623874,"authorDomain":"kenhi"}

                    I agree its misleading... my sister and my father lived in the same community in Pennsylvania... my sister died at 63 from drinking the water... my father died at 97 from eating ice cream everynight before going to bed... he drank the water too......... I think the ice cream neutralized the radioactivity in the water.......... whatdoyathinkofthat?

                    {"commentId":2623874,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"kenhi"}
                      #7.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:30 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      {"commentId":2622524,"authorDomain":"heron25"}

                      universal health care, universal food distribution, etc. is a joke. Will never happen. The concept of health care for everyone is not feasible even in the United States. You have 80% of the money controlled by 20% of the population and no way will they foot the bill for the remainder nor should they. At some point the concept of getting what you earn became getting what you deserve.

                      {"commentId":2622524,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"heron25"}
                        Reply#8 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:48 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":2622565,"authorDomain":"erickelly1"}

                        I work in the healthcare field in the United States, mostly in the ER, surgery, and imaging department of a hospital. The vast majority of people who leech off the system come into our ER/Hospital with more than enough money to pay for tattos, piercings, booze, cigarettes (literally over 80% of our ER patients smoke), food (most are obese), clothes, transportation, etc. - however, because they get "free" healthcare (i.e. they either never pay their bills and eventually declare bankruptcy, or get Medicaid) they engage in horrible health and lifestyle choices, and then demand that we fix them. In the meantime, hard-working, insured people keep away from the doctor's office or ER when they are feeling ill because THEY are the ones who get the shaft when they and their insurance company get the over-inflated bill (because they are the ones who end up paying the lion's share of the costs of the detritus that pays nothing.) And so their health suffers. Easy solution - get over the notion that healthcare is a "right". If you know that mistreating your body and engaging in unhealthy behavior is going to have a negative effect, then maybe that will get you off your butt and cause you to take better care of yourself, eat better, exercise, and be a responsible, productive member of any society. If you don't, you should suffer the consequences. It shouldn't be the burden of the ant to carry the weight of the grasshopper. But as long as there are leaders, social welfare rabble-rousers, and doe-eyed do-gooders with more heart than brains, we will have a prevailing school of thought that ends up causing everyone to suffer. Education is the key, but also consequences for actions is important. Picking people up when they fall down over and over and over again without any repurcussions for their erroneous ways trains them to never take responsibility for their actions and never suffer any consequences. And so they become like trained sheep and will always be a burden.

                        Demanding that everyone else pay for your poor lifestyle choices leads to socialism, which is and always will be the most evil system of control the world has ever seen.

                        {"commentId":2622565,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"erickelly1"}
                        • 4 votes
                        Reply#9 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:51 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":2622928,"authorDomain":"gsmarra"}

                        You can thank the legal system for setting precedence by making people not accountable for their own actions. People that get coffee at McD's have to drink it warm because an old lady can't hold her cup. And your comment about Socialism is American, "red scare" propaganda. Socialism and Communism are different. Please research this. Einstein supported Socialism.

                        {"commentId":2622928,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"gsmarra"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #9.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":2623097,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                        Mr G. You are right about there being a difference between socialism and communism. The good old USA has been a blend of socialism and capitalism for years. Even John McCain participates in socialism when he cashes his monthly social security check.

                        {"commentId":2623097,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                        • 1 vote
                        #9.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:32 PM EDT
                        {"commentId":2623175,"authorDomain":"hogtie-1"}

                        You hit it on the head Greywolf. I, and so many I know, have experienced the exact scenario you've just laid out. On my last visit to the ER, I was treated like a king once they found out I had BCBS. But, between unnecessary procedures, (three xrays for an abscess on my elbow?) and deny deny deny from my insurance co., I end up with a $1600 dollar bill which is now in collections! I WILL NOT PAY since that was my first and only claim with BCBS after 10 years of paying premiums. I will no more go back to the doctor than the man on the moon. I have to be literally dying before I'll do that again. Meanwhile my credit score drops 100 points, but I WILL NOT PAY!!!!!!! I'm not a picture of health, but I don't go to the doctor every week for a runny nose either. Next time I'll just lance the thing myself and pour some antibiotic ointment on it. $10 versus $2800, and I don't spend four hours in the frickin EMPTY emergency room. I think I would have been better off saying I had no insurance!

                        {"commentId":2623175,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"hogtie-1"}
                          #9.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:37 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":2623987,"authorDomain":"1misty"}

                          You - please don't, that's what the HMOs want, people to go away. Call BC/BS, tell them you want a review and to speak with management. Send a copy to the INSURANCE COMMISSIONER in your STATE, document names and dates with whom you've talked. They don't have to go up so high as to have the manager who makes a million+ dollars in bonus call you - docs and administrators get bonuses for keeping down costs. But do write in and do call for a manager. They will deny until they know you are not going away. They hope you will give up. Don't.

                          {"commentId":2623987,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"1misty"}
                          • 1 vote
                          #9.4 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:37 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":2624363,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                          1misty. I belonged to a HMO for years. They will do everything they can to cut health care to make a profit. I have even seen managers override a physicians order because of the cost of the care.

                          HMOs are not the answer for better health care.

                          {"commentId":2624363,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                          • 2 votes
                          #9.5 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:07 PM EDT
                          {"commentId":2624400,"authorDomain":"liquorup"}
                          liquorupDeleted
                          {"commentId":2624522,"authorDomain":"willp521"}

                          And the sad thing is, most Americans that work hard and try to make a living on their own, are the same ones that get brain-washed into voting for a politician that will raise taxes, expand government and increase federal spending. It's not a Democratic or Republican issue. This "Universal Healthcare" ideal, is just another form of a growing "mental" problem in the U.S. that will lead to the masses cheering like a bunch of drones and following aimlessly like sheep to whatever the media wants to feed them. First, it's market bail-outs [because after all....they are just too important to fail], then comes healthcare [so go ahead fatty, eat another burger.....the tax payers will help you] and then you get a ticket for farting in public because the methane from your butt is contributing to Global Warming. So gone on America, drink the cool-aid......everything will be just fine :)

                          {"commentId":2624522,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"willp521"}
                            #9.7 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:20 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":2625095,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                            In my 61 years no president has expanded government more than G. W. Bush and none has done more to raise taxes, although it will be taxes the next generation will have to pay. G. W. Bush has run the USA on credit. Also health care has declined during his administration.

                            {"commentId":2625095,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                            • 1 vote
                            #9.8 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:03 PM EDT
                            {"commentId":2655319,"authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}

                            Ray - if you are in a BCBS HMO it is illegal for the hopsital to balance bill you for the $1600. And if you have fee for service insurance you should only be responsible for your deductible and copay. If they accepted your insurance, they should not be able to balance bill for what the insurance company denied. You should definitely escalate the claim to a higher level at the insurance company and ask them if you are resonsible for the balance.

                            Depending on your insurance, you probably shouldn't be.

                            {"commentId":2655319,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}
                              #9.9 - Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:02 AM EDT
                              Reply
                              {"commentId":2622626,"authorDomain":"mckeand"}

                              Life isn't fair. If you took away all the money in the world and gave everyone an equal portion, in 10 or 20 years, for the most part, all the same people would be rich and all the same people would be poor. It is just the way things are, and the Socialists and the Communists have to face this reality. I don't want a universal health care system like in Europe or Canada. I'd rather not wait months to have a MRI if I need one. I don't want promising drugs held back from me because they are too expensive and I will die for the good of all. No thank you. Instead, encourage people to live healthier lives, donate to education in 3rd world countries, and encourage free trade and commerce. This is the path to health and productivity for all of mankind.

                              Hear hear to Grey Wolf.

                              {"commentId":2622626,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"mckeand"}
                              • 1 vote
                              Reply#10 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:56 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":2623149,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                              You have a point. I read one time that if a person had a million dollars and bought a million people a cheeseburger from McDonalds the next day the person who had the million dollars would be broke and the people who had the cheeseburgers would be hungry again. It avails us not to pour money into other nations if we do not have our own nation taken care of properly.

                              {"commentId":2623149,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                              • 3 votes
                              #10.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:35 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":2625744,"authorDomain":"mckeand"}

                              No. That wasn't necessarily my point. Nearly all of my charity leaves the country. Simple fact is that we have it the best in the world. Those who don't get educated in this country or become successful have no one but themselves to blame. I donate money for education in some of the poorest countries in the world. These kids do not have the same opportunities that our kids do. They have real "walls" there. Sometimes, abject poverty, racism, ethnic discrimination, sexism, religious discrimination. After visiting Africa, I have a new appreciation of just how lucky some of our poorest citizens are. Besides, my dollar goes a lot father in those countries. I can help more people. In addition, these countries will become more productive and then we have new friends to trade with and help protect each other. It is true what they say. You give and you shall receive. Give a man a fish and he'll be fed for today, teach a man to fish and he'll be fed for a lifetime. Throwing money at something isn't the right answer, but educating and offering the people opportunities is the right answer. Some want to be lazy, but many more do not. Give them their shot. This shot is what we Americans take for granted.

                              {"commentId":2625744,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"mckeand"}
                              • 1 vote
                              #10.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:01 PM EDT
                              {"commentId":2625876,"authorDomain":"kuku"}

                              I think there is a buddhist proverb: you should never give a fish to hungry, but teach him how to catch a fish

                              {"commentId":2625876,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"kuku"}
                                #10.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:12 PM EDT
                                Reply
                                {"commentId":2622644,"authorDomain":"jimradio"}

                                are we our brothers keepers?

                                if i live in the united states, is the state of health in africa my concern?

                                why does an imaginary line drawn by someone on a map mean that everyone on this side of the lie is important...and everyone on that side of the line is not important.

                                the problem is the human heart...as many religious people thru-out history have said.

                                {"commentId":2622644,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"jimradio"}
                                  Reply#11 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:57 PM EDT
                                  {"commentId":2622693,"authorDomain":"horizondesign"}

                                  It's another grand Idea that looks good on paper,but is not practical. Look at all of the Aid that goes to these countries already. How many African nations receive aid in food and cash, only to have it go to the wealthy or Military in that country instead of to whom it was intended for? Who will inforce the Health Care issue in these countries? It's like saying that you need to get rid of greed and corruption and then we can all have universal Health Care......OK Hillary, let me know how that works out for you.

                                  {"commentId":2622693,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"horizondesign"}
                                    Reply#12 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:01 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":2622704,"authorDomain":"bker1492"}

                                    What this article should say is MAJOR INEQUITIES IN CULTURAL AND LIFESTYLE DECISIONS CREATE DIFFERENCES IN LIFESPANS THAT NO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM OF ANY KIND CAN CORRECT.

                                    {"commentId":2622704,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"bker1492"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    Reply#13 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:02 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":2623260,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                    Poverty is not a cultural of lifestyle decision.

                                    {"commentId":2623260,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                    • 1 vote
                                    #13.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:42 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":2624305,"authorDomain":"lne80"}

                                    You are right, poverty is not a lifestyle decision, but I agree completely that this article does not discuss the differences of lifestyle decisions and lifespan. Just look at the picture of the old Japanese women, what are they doing??? WORKING in the fields, doing manual labor!! Do you see any old Americans, or for that matter any rich people in any country period, working in the fields?? No we have machines that do it while we SIT on our butts all day on computers, then go home and SIT and watch TV, and our kids SIT and play video games, then eat processed dinners!!! How is it that our dogs can be taken away from us for feeding them chips and soda but it is okay to feed our kids???? We are committing SUICIDE BY LIFESTYLE.

                                    {"commentId":2624305,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"lne80"}
                                    • 3 votes
                                    #13.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:02 PM EDT
                                    {"commentId":2624750,"authorDomain":"willp521"}

                                    Amen brother!

                                    {"commentId":2624750,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"willp521"}
                                      #13.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:37 PM EDT
                                      {"commentId":2625926,"authorDomain":"kuku"}

                                      LNE,

                                      just a short remark - African woman also does a lot of manual labor, which doesn't help her to live longer, apparently.

                                      Moderation is necessary in everything you do.

                                      {"commentId":2625926,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"kuku"}
                                        #13.4 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:17 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":2622820,"authorDomain":"professor71"}

                                        I think everyone in this country should have free primary health care. EX. Free physicals, free immunizations, If you break a bone free emergency care. BUT beyond primary care we should have our own policies because as already stated we should all be responsible and accountable for our own health and lifestyles. The big problem is if the government is involved they will screw it up just like they do everything else they try to manage.

                                        {"commentId":2622820,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"professor71"}
                                        • 1 vote
                                        Reply#14 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:11 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":2623203,"authorDomain":"br5"}

                                        And who pays for this "free" lunch???

                                        {"commentId":2623203,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"br5"}
                                        • 2 votes
                                        #14.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:39 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":2623297,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                        Drug companies need some kind of regulation. It is obscene the huge profits they make on people's misery. They are completely amok and out of control.

                                        {"commentId":2623297,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                        • 2 votes
                                        #14.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:45 PM EDT
                                        {"commentId":2623377,"authorDomain":"professor71"}

                                        Bob-434277 Take the Billions we are giving away to countries who do not like us.

                                        {"commentId":2623377,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"professor71"}
                                        • 2 votes
                                        #14.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:51 PM EDT
                                        Reply
                                        {"commentId":2622849,"authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}

                                        Agreed. or how about. LIFE is tough and can lead to early death in certain parts of the world.

                                        {"commentId":2622849,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}
                                          Reply#15 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:13 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":2623323,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                          Death is the end result of life, but there is no need to rush it by lack of proper medical attention.

                                          {"commentId":2623323,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                          • 1 vote
                                          #15.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:46 PM EDT
                                          {"commentId":2623395,"authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}

                                          Agreed. But, we no longer can save the world. We need to focus on our own country.

                                          {"commentId":2623395,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}
                                            #15.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
                                            {"commentId":2624451,"authorDomain":"liquorup"}
                                            liquorupDeleted
                                            Reply
                                            {"commentId":2622867,"authorDomain":"puttd"}

                                            I don't get the logic. Scotland is part of Great Britain, which has universal health care. There is a 28 year difference in life expectancy in the same region. How does one get to the solution that universal health care is needed to fix changes in life expectancies. Obviously the presence of universal health care didn't solve the differences in GB.

                                            {"commentId":2622867,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"puttd"}
                                            • 2 votes
                                            Reply#16 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:14 PM EDT
                                            {"commentId":2625954,"authorDomain":"kuku"}

                                            probably, their health care is not too universal

                                            {"commentId":2625954,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"kuku"}
                                              #16.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:20 PM EDT
                                              Reply
                                              {"commentId":2622876,"authorDomain":"crazymail"}

                                              If you live in America life can end before it starts legally.

                                              {"commentId":2622876,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"crazymail"}
                                              • 1 vote
                                              Reply#17 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:15 PM EDT
                                              {"commentId":2622887,"authorDomain":"drago-dragonheart"}

                                              I see everyone talking about universal health care. But to see anyone doing anything about it is nothing more than a Daydream delusion. Do you think anybody is coming to do something about it? definitely not, cause it won't make them any money. so it won't matter to them or any of the governments. THEY DON'T CARE !!!!!

                                              {"commentId":2622887,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"drago-dragonheart"}
                                                Reply#18 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:16 PM EDT
                                                {"commentId":2623383,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                                THEY may not care, but if WE care enough maybe THEY will have to listen. Everything has to start somewhere. WE can begin by voting for advocated of health reform.

                                                {"commentId":2623383,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                                • 2 votes
                                                #18.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:51 PM EDT
                                                {"commentId":2625896,"authorDomain":"mckeand"}

                                                Just stop. We have national health care. If you are injured or need medical attention, you will get it, regardless of your ability to pay. That isn't true in many other countries. If you break your arm in Iran and you don't have the cash on hand to fix it, tough luck. It isn't about people caring. Feelings do not trump logic. Money does not grow on trees and you cannot demand people pay for the care of people they don't want to care for. It creates resentment and a whole nation full of people who feel entitled. You are not entitled to anything. This is the truth. Nothing. Life is not fair. We can try to make it more fair, but it isn't fair. Period. Grey Wolf is correct. If we didn't have the national care system that we already have, those of us who are insured would have better care for things that happen in life. Those who live risky lives and do risky things would have to actually pay the consequences of that. No matter how poor my parents became and we were living in 1 room for 5 people and families donated food to us, my father never let the health insurance lapse. He understood that he would bankrupt his family and have to ask for government aid, which would have crushed his pride and integrity. I have friends without insurance who constantly bemoan that fact. I have shown them where they can get health insurance for $100 a month. They scoff. They can still afford to smoke, go out to eat, go clubbing, buy crap for their apartments. Guess what, when one had an accident and the bill came, they cried foul. Well, BS! Deal with it. Bad choices often have bad consequences.

                                                {"commentId":2625896,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"mckeand"}
                                                  #18.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:14 PM EDT
                                                  Reply
                                                  {"commentId":2622922,"authorDomain":"bill-stull"}

                                                  Trying to feel sorry again. They have universal health care there. If you do not take care of yourself. That is the difference. So all the hard work I have done. I could have made more money without health insurance. Know I have to pay for the all the world. If these countries want universal then have them pay for it. I am tired of paying for all the lazy and stupid people. It is not my fault that people will not be energetic like me.

                                                  {"commentId":2622922,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"bill-stull"}
                                                    Reply#19 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:19 PM EDT
                                                    {"commentId":2622931,"authorDomain":"owenb-1"}

                                                    I don't need any more taxes bestowed upon me to help provide healthcare for people that will not work or to interfere with the goverment of a foreign country. I know that God has blessed the U.S. and we should help others, but there is a limit to how much our means of relief will permit.

                                                    {"commentId":2622931,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"owenb-1"}
                                                      Reply#20 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:20 PM EDT
                                                      {"commentId":2623402,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                                      It is OK to help others, but we have many poor right here in the USA who need help. Charity starts at home.

                                                      {"commentId":2623402,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                                      • 2 votes
                                                      #20.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:52 PM EDT
                                                      {"commentId":2626002,"authorDomain":"mckeand"}

                                                      We don't have poverty here. Not real poverty. Go anywhere besides Europe, Canada, and the United States and you will find it in spades. The closest we have to poverty is the Appalachians and the deep south. This can be rectified through education and a change in attitude.

                                                      {"commentId":2626002,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"mckeand"}
                                                        #20.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:25 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":2626723,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                                        Melissa...drive through Appilachia sometime. You will see poverty and it is real.

                                                        {"commentId":2626723,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                                        • 1 vote
                                                        #20.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:49 PM EDT
                                                        {"commentId":2640377,"authorDomain":"mckeand"}

                                                        I already acknowledged the Appalachians. We did some volunteer work in those parts.

                                                        {"commentId":2640377,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"mckeand"}
                                                          #20.4 - Fri Aug 29, 2008 1:07 PM EDT
                                                          Reply
                                                          {"commentId":2622966,"authorDomain":"gold-and-fire"}

                                                          How do all of you propose that we pay for Universal Health care? The test state of Massachusetts has been running a Universal healthcare program for less than 6 months and they are already 1 BILLION in debt because of it. If the government pays for Universal Healthcare, what happens to the dollars that fund the Medical research? I'm just saying...

                                                          {"commentId":2622966,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"gold-and-fire"}
                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          Reply#21 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
                                                          {"commentId":2623430,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                                          One way we might help pay for it is to quit invading other countries. Wars should be defensive.

                                                          {"commentId":2623430,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                                          • 2 votes
                                                          #21.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:54 PM EDT
                                                          Reply
                                                          {"commentId":2622984,"authorDomain":"olsrog"}

                                                          One life expectancy discrepancy the article does not mention is that everywhere in the world females (on average) live longer than their male counterparts. Why is that and why is the World Health Organization not doing anything to study it and encourage equal life expectancy between males and females?

                                                          {"commentId":2622984,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"olsrog"}
                                                            Reply#22 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:24 PM EDT
                                                            {"commentId":2655211,"authorDomain":"horsepower107"}

                                                            Genetics look after females the same as a concerned car owner tends for his vehicle , they both get 'Regular oil changes ' , sorry , but it is the only practical difference i can think of .

                                                            {"commentId":2655211,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"horsepower107"}
                                                              #22.1 - Sat Aug 30, 2008 1:51 AM EDT
                                                              {"commentId":2655550,"authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}

                                                              That's simple enough - testosterone - aggression - fragility.

                                                              For every 100 female babies conceived there are 110 males conceived. 5 males die in utero. By some where in the twenties another 5 males are dead. And it is down hill form there. You have higher rates of cancer, heart disease and stroke. Earlier onset of heart disease. You have higher rates of accidents and aggression from childhood. Higher rates of suicide, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Higher rates of criminal behavior, incarceration and murder.

                                                              And there is much more from the medical side.

                                                              And from a survival of the species perspective you are less necessary than we are - at least until menopause. You produce millions of sperm cells a day. We produce 13 eggs a year 2 to 4 of which are viable from ages 13-45. Do the math. And then there's pregnancy and giving birth - got to be tough to survive that - multiple times.

                                                              In the end we are tougher than you are from the moment of conception.

                                                              {"commentId":2655550,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}
                                                                #22.2 - Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:29 AM EDT
                                                                Reply
                                                                {"commentId":2623009,"authorDomain":"planenut"}

                                                                And it took someone with a degree to figure this one out! There are billions of people on this planet not all of are going to live a long life and global health care will not fix it.

                                                                {"commentId":2623009,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"planenut"}
                                                                  Reply#23 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:26 PM EDT
                                                                  {"commentId":2623046,"authorDomain":"gsdgdgdsfg"}

                                                                  "Virtually all advanced countries have universal health care systems"

                                                                  No you see virtually all socialist, Marxist, communist country's do.

                                                                  The most advanced country in the world, The United States of America, does not.

                                                                  People come from Canada just to get our health care, and quite frankly we currently have the best health care system in the world (not to say that it couldn't use some slight changes).

                                                                  When the supply of medicine such as vaccines runs out, how do you decide who gets the vaccines and who does not? The people that are screwed out of it in the "advanced" country's are the elderly and the dieing who are considered less human, as if they don't need it as much as other people.

                                                                  You can not provide vaccines for everybody, especially when its government mandated for the company to basically give it away to the government for free or very cheap.

                                                                  The reason why we have such advanced medicines is because company's work on medicines to make a profit. It is capitalism at work that has got us here, and socialism will only keep us here.

                                                                  {"commentId":2623046,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"gsdgdgdsfg"}
                                                                    Reply#24 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:28 PM EDT
                                                                    {"commentId":2623181,"authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}

                                                                    And let us not forget we need to figure in the 20-25 million illegal immigrants that will be added to the cost for this health care plan. Oh, and they will also have their relatives up here soon. So that's a new total of 80 million within 10 years. Now that is going to be some interesting medical care.

                                                                    {"commentId":2623181,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}
                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #24.1 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:38 PM EDT
                                                                    {"commentId":2623459,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                                                    It is easy to see you are well insured. If you were in poverty watching your young child die you might sing another song.

                                                                    {"commentId":2623459,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                                                    • 3 votes
                                                                    #24.2 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:57 PM EDT
                                                                    {"commentId":2623603,"authorDomain":"ghbranting"}

                                                                    We do not all rush down to the good Ole USA to get health care. I am a senior citizen up here in the great white socialist north and I have had children and breast cancer, I have also had my appendicts removed and I pay a small amount of insurance to my plan and i think that is pretty wonderful. I don't have a huge deductable that I have to pay one of the weathiest conglomerates known to man kind either so that I can get health care when I need it. The root of all evil in this bloody world is greed!!!!

                                                                    {"commentId":2623603,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"ghbranting"}
                                                                    • 4 votes
                                                                    #24.3 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 PM EDT
                                                                    {"commentId":2624423,"authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}

                                                                    Thank you for making that point. It needed to be made.

                                                                    {"commentId":2624423,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"stillwatertoo"}
                                                                    • 1 vote
                                                                    #24.4 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 5:11 PM EDT
                                                                    {"commentId":2626892,"authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}

                                                                    h2o-3931184 You bet I have insurance with a huge deductible. I work hard and make sure that I can afford to be treated, if I need care. You don't know what I have witnessed. Where in the constitution does it grant the right to health care or financial security. If you believe social health care will change the results...I have some bad news for you.

                                                                    {"commentId":2626892,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"makinhavoc"}
                                                                      #24.5 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:08 PM EDT
                                                                      Reply
                                                                      {"commentId":2623088,"authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}

                                                                      In the developing countries maybe the focus needs to be on stopping wars, building infrastructure, food, clothing, shelter, clean water, education for jobs and extreme poverty before universal health care becomes the biggest issue. Many developing countries have far bigger problems that need to be resolved first.

                                                                      Universal health care for all in this country would be a wonderful thing. But some how I don't see it happening any time soon. Our system is too fragmented and there are too many powerful special interest groups that will fight it the bitter end. Anyway can you imagine if we all had Medicare or something like it - rationing like they have in other countries would likely start and then private medicine for the rich would start up on the side.

                                                                      {"commentId":2623088,"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301","authorDomain":"Bev-33071"}
                                                                        Reply#25 - Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:31 PM EDT
                                                                        Jump to discussion page: 1 2 3
                                                                        {"canLink":false,"threadId":"342212","isPrivate":false}
                                                                        Leave a Comment:
                                                                        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                                                                        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                                                                        {"threadId":"342212","contentId":"1797301"}
                                                                        Start TrackingStart Tracking
                                                                        Stop TrackingStop Tracking